• Vulnerable U
  • Posts
  • Meta's Threads Ground Zero for Election Hacking Conspiracy Theories

Meta's Threads Ground Zero for Election Hacking Conspiracy Theories

BlueAnon, Liberal Q, Stephen Spoonamore, and more conspiracies are going viral while trust in traditional reporting remains low

Meta's Threads app is having a meltdown moment, with thousands of users pushing wild theories about hacked voting machines and secret plots. The platform that was supposed to be Twitter's sensible cousin has turned into a breeding ground for what some are calling "BluAnon."

Kudos to Taylor Lorenz for her write-up on this, I wanted to give the cybersecurity angle on the story.

Why it matters: This surge of conspiracy theories shows how Meta's attempts to limit political content have backfired spectacularly, creating an information vacuum where misinformation thrives unchecked.

Key points:

  • Liberal users are spreading baseless claims about election fraud

  • Elon Musk's Starlink is being falsely accused of election interference

  • Meta's fact-checking efforts aren't keeping up with the flood of conspiracies

  • The platform's downranking of journalism has left users without reliable sources

The Conspiracy Du Jour

The latest viral theory? That Elon Musk somehow hacked the election through Starlink satellites. (Plot twist: Musk himself was pushing Dominion voting machine conspiracy theories at a Trump rally last month). Users are also pushing increasingly bizarre claims about Biden orchestrating Democratic losses as part of some 4D chess move against Trump.

Of course Threads isn’t alone on this.

"Liberal Q"

A figure known as Stephen Spoonamore has emerged as what some call the "liberal Q," with users frantically sharing his claims about election hacking. His posts, which include ominous warnings about personal safety, are spreading like wildfire across the platform.

I’m also a cybersecurity professional. I’ve been a penetration tester and, yes, have hacked major companies. The fact that things can be hacked is not evidence that this election was hacked.

Context:

  • Meta deliberately limited news content on Threads

  • Users report being unable to find reliable news sources

  • Even users with political content filtered out are seeing conspiracy theories

  • The phenomenon mirrors similar conspiracy movements on the right

The bigger picture: This isn't just a Threads problem - it's a symptom of a broader crisis in how we process information. As trust in mainstream media crumbles, both sides of the political spectrum are retreating into their own reality bubbles.

While we don’t have evidence about election hacking, we do have plenty of evidence of massive Russian disinformation campaigns. They don’t care what side they’re sparking divisiveness in, and will be just as happy with “BlueAnon” as they were with the 2016 and 2020 conspiracy theories on the right.

What's next: Meta's content moderation policies are already strict, but they're fighting against a tide of declining trust in traditional media. The real challenge isn't just stopping misinformation - it's rebuilding trust in factual reporting.

I’d like to end with the exact quote Lorenz ends her article with because I think it is worded perfectly.

As trust in factual reporting collapses, people will deny even the most rigorously verified truths. This widespread denialism sets the stage for unchecked power, where propaganda thrives, dissent is stifled, and democracy itself is at risk.